So there's this little blurb going around on Facebook in which the BBC has listed 100 books written over the last 200 years or so and asked people how many they and their friends have read. The books are diverse and include everything from Jane Austen to J D Salinger to Harry Potter.
Obviously the BBC thinks this list is important in some way or that people who have read some of these books are educated or well-informed. There is a note informing us that most people would have read only 6 out of those 100 books. Perhaps this is startling.
But what is startling by orders of magnitude is that this list of 100 books does not include a single scientific work
. Now of course people would not be expected to have read The Principia. But what about Darwin's "The Origin of Species"? Or, looking at something more modern and still pivotal, Thomas Kuhn's "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions"? These volumes are comparable to many of the books listed by the BBC, certainly in terms of comprehension, and also almost certainly in terms of importance.
Most prominently, what about C P Snow's "The Two Cultures" which lamented the rift between science and the humanities? You want to see a classic example of this rift? WItness the BBC list! Snow would have nodded his head vigorously, especially and most ironically because the exclusion of his own volume from the list makes his point resoundingly clear.
So, dear BBC, if I were to draw up my own short and admittedly limited list of scientific works that surely deserve as much of a place in the "educated" man's mind as the august books you present, I would cite the following. I haven't read all of these works; but with all I have a passing familiarity and some I have read more seriously. Let's even forget Newton's "Principia" for now and focus on the last 200 years as the BBC mostly has, and even just on the 20th century. Of course some of the following are more important than others; some are popular treatments while others are defining and fundamental volumes for their respective fields. But one can still come up with a highly readable list, which in my opinion would enrich the mind of any human being.
1. The Origin of Species- Charles Darwin
2. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions- Thomas Kuhn
3. The Logic of Scientific Discovery- Karl Popper
4. Silent Spring- Rachel Carson
5. Science and the Common Understanding- J. Robert Oppenheimer
6. Principia Mathematica- Bertrand Russell and Alfred North Whitehead
7. Physics and Philosophy- Werner Heisenberg
8. Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions- Edwin Abbott
9. On Growth and Form- D'Arcy Thompson
10. What is Life?- Erwin Schrodinger
11. Men of Mathematics- E T Bell
12. Microbe Hunters- Paul De Kruif
13. The Mismeasure of Man- Stephen Jay Gould
14. The Selfish Gene- Richard Dawkins
15. Sociobiology- E O Wilson
16. Mr. Tompkins- George Gamow
17. The Double Helix- James Watson
18. The Nature of the Chemical Bond- Linus Pauling
19. Chaos- James Gleick
20. Advice to a Young Scientist- Peter Medawar
21. The Two Cultures- C P Snow
Consider the diverse and varying importance of these works. Kuhn and Popper are defining volumes in the philosophy of science. Darwin needs no explanation. Schrodinger inspired a generation of physicists like Francis Crick to change fields and initiate a revolution in biology. E O Wilson's book started a fierce chapter in the "nature vs nurture" debate whose ramifications can still be felt. In one fell swoop Gould demolished the foundations of scientific racism and eugenics. Pauling's book is one of the most important scientific works of all time and redefined chemistry. D'Arcy Thompson's beautiful volume established the mathematical foundations of developmental biology. Bell and De Kruif both inspired dozens of famous scientists like Andrew Weil and John Nash who went on to do groundbreaking work and win Fields and Nobel medals. Russell's book was a landmark event designed to provide a foundation for all of mathematics. Watson's book is considered the archetype of how real science is done, warts and all. Carson became the godmother of the modern environmental movement. On a more limited but important level, Gleick, Gamow and Dawkins made chaos theory, quantum physics and selfish genes comprehensible to the layman. And Medawar, Oppenheimer and Snow wrote deeply thoughtful volumes on the relationship between science, society and culture.
Now I suppose it would not be too presumptuous to ask the question; how many of these have the BBC list-makers read?
Labels: Books, desipundit, science